Subject: [VOT] Electorale - Întrebări

You are one of the 16 users in the closed association, all of them voted against me (and for kreator and lord, as they are both there..) and obviously my answers means nothing to you, your questions where just ment to set me up as everyone here knows, you don't need it..
;-)

btw, anaconda talked to me yesterday (not on sokker, but i bet he will be back in the future..;-), and explaind to me the idea of that forum and what he wanted to do by that when he started with it, i can understand it and see the pluses, but i believe it should be done a bit different than how it's now..

now you are going totally wrong,,,,thats not good..you have NO ideea what are you talking about...do you know me?do you know my toughts??im so disappointed that you are getting influenced by some users..

it is your choice if you take my q seriously or not!!

cheers!

The way you asked it looked like that..
But, here are the answers, also for those who wanted to know in general.

1.So,if things goes like the way you say,how do you will control random(according to you it is the MOST IMPORTANT THING atm)??

- I can't control random, no one can, but you can try and make it less important, try to position the players right, try to be right on how you opponent will play and overall to just try and do the best possible before the match starts, other than trying to do the max before the match there is nothing to do..

2.Why do we need your experience or any other candidate if it doesen't matter in new engine???

- Because still an experienced manager will know how to try and limit the random element in setting up the tactic, choosing the players and etc.


3.If it is bad for teams like Romania why do you want to control this team if you expect bad results???

- I would have wanted to manage Romania same as if it was a country with 20 users, i didn't say i expect bad results in any post, the fact that i think that this match engine is better for smaller NT's (and it's obvious because you see more surprises than before) dosn't mean Romania should expect bad results (and that's regardles to who is the manager).



(edited)

+1

@ kreator and Sharoni123

do you consider my question irelevant ?

What did you asked?..
:-O

He asked if we find him handsome :P

Zi Mihai ce ai intrebat, ca la atata spam, ne-a trecut printre randuri intrebarea ta valoroasa. :)
(edited)

mai are rost apararea in 5 fundasi daca jucati o aparare joasa ? :)

are 5 DEFs still needed , if , for exemple, you choose to play a low defense ?
(edited)

As all my tactical answers, it depends on how your opponent will play, if he playes without a winger and with low strikers than low defence with 4 men can be good, if he plays with a winger or wide and low strikers than 5 men can be good..

but, a smart tactician won't play all matches with the same tactic.

you must risk and think, and sometimes a copmpromise is needed

Da are Mihai, are rost. 5 fundasi sunt mai buni decat 4, de acord cu tine ca apararea joasa blocheaza cu succes extrema, insa totusi mijlocul ramane putin descoperit, iar 2 atacanti pot trece usor pe centru.

Si depinde de tactica adversarului, dar.... un user experimentat la NT nu va juca cu aceeasi tactica, mai ales in meciurile importante, deci nu ma bazez pe ea. Daca simt eu cu 24 ore inaintea meciului ca trebuie jucat cu 5 fundasi - voi juca.

mmm.. yes, but what dose that has to do with the question you asked....

cause, you can be trick by a manager who is using tactic switch.

remember that isn't necessary to play all the match with winger ;) or, he can play 3 matches with same tactic and change the position of the strikers with you.
(edited)

mmm
I think i played a couple of NT matches during my 18 seasons as an NT manager and seen a thing or two, and usually they play same tactic for 3 months and they change it against me so..
;-)