Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: [IDEA] Premiership

  • 1
2017-08-07 14:49:12
Bryan Robson to All
Put some more teams into the premiership like 10 in every country, then have the bottom team relegated 7th, 8th, 9th playoffs, because coming 5th & going down is a shambles, 5th best in your country is a really good position.

I feel more strongly about this than anything else in sokker.
2017-08-07 17:24:14
Couldn't agree more ! Would make things more competitive for sure
2017-08-07 18:01:44
If you put 10 teams into the premiership, that would make 18 matches for each team per season = 4 more weeks. That just won't work with the rest of the leagues still consisting of 8 teams.
2017-08-07 18:07:52
Good point, so we need 10 in each league, then the seasons wouldn't fit into the year as well but age change can happen at same time...
2017-08-07 18:10:26
this will require lots of dev modifications and you know guys dev team do not work at all this days :(
2017-08-07 20:01:34
there was a moment last year, he even lost his team :D

/edit: and even now he hasn't logins on his profile.
(edited)
2017-08-07 20:57:40
Indeed, too many matches.

Bot teams should be deleted from leagues much sooner and be replaced by active teams. That would make it much more fun for everyone.

Or let bot teams use different tactics so it's not that predictable anymore.


And use this idea:

http://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/1261/ID_topic/3275276/pg/0#new


Unfortunately, DEVs have seen all ideas already a number of times but they/he don't change a thing to make leagues better and more fun.
2017-08-09 19:53:27
If you put 10 teams into the premiership, that would make 18 matches for each team per season = 4 more weeks. That just won't work with the rest of the leagues still consisting of 8 teams.

Not necessarily. Use the last 4 thursdays on the season to league.
2017-08-09 21:53:09
That's arguably a bigger mess, with some teams playing more matches per week, and only in some weeks, setting an irregular pace through the season... In those last 4 weeks injuries and low form would punish you double, adding more randomness to the championship fight, and then there's the extra income in the week... It's a much bigger mess than an 18-week season.

I wouldn't mind seasons being longer and all leagues having more teams, although not a necessity to me. But I would certainly be against having this double match in some weeks. I like the weekly pace of Sokker.
2017-08-10 01:05:42
....
(edited)
2017-08-16 17:47:54
That's arguably a bigger mess, with some teams playing more matches per week, and only in some weeks, setting an irregular pace through the season... In those last 4 weeks injuries and low form would punish you double, adding more randomness to the championship fight, and then there's the extra income in the week... It's a much bigger mess than an 18-week season.

Why? If all championships on the world have weeks with 2 games and weeks with 1 only. And this no create an unfair situation to no one.
2017-09-10 13:37:41
Why? If all championships on the world have weeks with 2 games and weeks with 1 only. And this no create an unfair situation to no one.

You can play those 'championships on the world', if you want :)

This is Sokker, it has some schedules that the managers who keep playing (in spite of DEVS not giving a shit about making any enhancement over YEARS) have accustomed to, and there are not few of those people who have grown playing Sokker and now have RL schedules too (work, own family, etc), and to whom more matches per week could be bothersome (and so, unfair for them comparing vs those who have no anything else to do than logging continuously every day).

So bad idea (aside, expanding the #of teams per leagues have been proposed -and sismissed- may times in the past -you can search older threads in this same forum-, and this 'new' proposal does not add anything at all interesting enough for considering to make a change in that direction -and that, of course, if DEVs would be in disposition to introduce ANY change at all... ^^-).
2017-09-28 18:06:33
I don't agree with that. The changes will be absorb by most of users and the numbers of managers will increase.
  • 1