Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
 Topic closed!!!

Subject: World Cup 3

2007-08-14 21:25:32
Do you ban by mistake?

Please say you do :-)


of course, we are doing mistakes sometimes...

but that's why we are asking email's from banned users if they have somekind of explanation, or something like that...

we're only waiting for an explanation

sorry but that explanation about ban goes only to user which is banned...
(edited)
2007-08-14 21:27:18
User is a user. No matter if he is a well-known NT coach or not. He has gotten an information in his mail adress for sure about it. And World Cup thread is not a place to ask for an explanation.
2007-08-14 21:28:01
Isn't this Joosep Naarits also overpaid?

edit by hautsi: it's nothing to do with transfer prices and average price for player like naarits is around 2,8mln €, so it's little bit high price but not so overbidded... this player is almoust identical than naarits when he was sold, but 1y younger: player ID: 878210

and let's not talk about this in world cup 3 thread...
(edited)
2007-08-14 21:28:55
In Czech republic there were two wery known users banned: NT-coach guanaco and cup winner murinho007 and be sure that it is utopian to wait for officaial explanation ;-) But always there is some reason...
(edited)
2007-08-14 22:22:33
I don't believe that Hellsangel could do something which deserved for ban from the game
2007-08-14 22:23:34
I think that the other player redbull saw during the match what a good player it was, and wanted to buy him, with money not being a prob.
2007-08-14 22:28:45
we never ban user's "for joke"...

you don't what do Papcio Daniels when he drink too much :p
2007-08-14 23:22:45
Buu...I hope that he will be back till friday if he is clear...:(
2007-08-14 23:45:58
I think he got banned for this one
2007-08-14 23:47:32
There is no reason for banning people because they proposed an idea. It's probably because of a transfer.
2007-08-15 00:02:59
oh my... its you... again...
2007-08-15 00:03:31
oh, don't be Dumb :p

(sorry, could't let it)
2007-08-15 06:35:04
[:OO]
2007-08-15 09:32:17
but that's why we are asking email's from banned users if they have somekind of explanation, or something like that...
Why do admins first ban people and ask afterwards for an explanation ?
Shouldn't it be the other way round ?
2007-08-15 09:34:10
no, it will be a helljob for admins in this case
2007-08-15 09:37:29
indeed: first arrest the suspect, then proove he's wrong and then he can try to deny it :p


anway, goooo Belgium and Eesti :p