Subject: »Future NT stars (U21) NO ADS

And yes it was confirmed, ill find the quote soon for you.

show me the quote and where it was posted, then we can talk

and stop saying 'if you don't understand math blablabla'
math is not the point when your data is clearly wrong

good night

yes, two official games (or more).

friendly is not an official game.

ergo league + Champions Cup/National Cup game [0.90 + theoretical 0.90] = 100%.

it has no connection with your theory of NT [0.45] + friendly [0.70] = 100%.

in 2008 there were no Champions Cup games, so greg probably was referring to league game + cup game. it was the only option for two official games back then.

either way, you're wrong.

(edited)

exactly

Epic fail :P

But we have many 'crack' as CM/DM, off-mid is awesome player for team and NT. 20m€ is waste money. I bought player, 3 skills worst as Barbez and I paid only 11,5M€ :)

And by the same logic I can say that I've bought a player that is 3 skill behind Your player and payed only 2.5 M. 3 skills is enough to put players in different tiers at this age ;)

In retrospective, I have some regrets for buying Napoleon and Bouzas because back them I was planning to train those two + Luissel as my future attackers and just spending another 100M on rest of my squad once those ones are ready (which also resulted in selling Gminsky). Now I'm stuck with 7 future NT stars which all need playing time and I could have some problems adjusting my training schedule and their peeks should be separated few years. But I definitely don't have any regrets paying 20+M for both Luissel and Barbez after all since both ones are one in few years prospects. After all, at one point, I was seriously considering spending 130M € on my stadium...

So how do you know this, your highness, if I may ask....

What I said is strictly my oppinion, I've trained hundred of players, a lot of them have been to u21, have played a lot of matches, and some other users said the same as me

You don't know everything mate, so atop acting like you're Greg, cuz you're not....only he knows the real formula

spin til borkos007
he means 90 min friendly +u21 match...

that should be close to 100% training from my oppinion

Here you agree with me..... then u dont understand the math im doing, and then starts disagreeing cause u cant see that 70+30=42% increase

-----------------

Epic fail by me though to mistake there was a quote of greg by 2 matches = full training, when i searched for it, i only found some admins saying he said it......

And im not acting like i know everything, but for sure as hell i know % math, and that was where this debate started from....

If you are right, that friendly + NT is only around 85% training, then your numbers (or most of them) is right.... i do though believe nt+ friendly is 100%

But what made me furios and rampage yesterday was, that one at time, you each came with little quotes of a bigger conversation, and misunderstanding what numbers you took out of context...... kind of annoying to have to repeat over and over again how i got an result, and then a new one comes and take a number out of context and saying that is something else, which in this case was wrong, the only thing that could be debated was how much a match or matches gives, which you in the end got highlighted was where we was off from each others conclusion....
(edited)

I understand, but there was no point in talking about the picture and math when you had wrong data to start the calculations, that's all :-)

I understood your idea and calculations, I just disagreed with the data you used for the equations :)

And NT+friendly is far from 100%...actually I believe even Cup + league is not 100%, it was just a simplification by greg, you saw how 'elaborate' that response was

most probably with League + Cup [or any 0.90 + 0.90] you get ~95%, and another match [for example NT] adds around 2-3% or even less...so there is basically no difference

at least that's how one Polish user explained the most probable model used for the training model in sokker :-)
(edited)

divine

Pelle Sirge, age: 18, height: 179 cm
value: 150 500 €, wage: 1 850 €
club: MC Tige Tikker, country: Eesti
very good form, tragic tactical discipline

good stamina, poor keeper
good pace, very good defender
very good technique, good playmaker
average passing, solid striker

Terrible skill distribution
But stil, with his obvious talent he'll be good

4 to brilliant pace

Dito Leeuwin, âge: 18
club: SK_SLAVIA_PRAHA, pays: Nederland,
valeur: 8 070 021 Kč, salaire: 68 251 Kč,
très bon [9] forme, très bon [9] discipline tactique,
taille: 177 cm, poids: 68.3 kg, IMC: 21.8

médiocre [3] endurance tragique [0] gardien
brillant [14] vitesse faible [4] défense
honorable [8] technique faible [4] construction
médiocre [3] passe excellent [10] buteur

Today from youth-school:

Facchinetti, 16 years

hopeless stamina tragic keeper
average pace tragic defender
average technique adequate playmaker
adequate passing tragic striker

I`am not up to date. Is he just good or even world-class?

2 matches per week?

not really, played 3times 1x sunday and 1time 1x wednesday